Skip to content
Spin Talks

Might Different Nations Pursue Australia's in Banning Social Media for Under-16s?

The nation's controversial move to prohibit social media access for young people below 16 is sending ripples worldwide. Officials, safety advocates, and parents are observing intently to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for other nations.

European Movement

Throughout Europe, a growing group of nations are exploring comparable restrictions.

  • Denmark plans a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM arguing that mobile devices and networks are "robbing our youngsters' childhood". A law could be formalized in the coming year.
  • The Norwegian government is planning to enforce a age restriction of 15, citing the need to protect the young from the "influence of the algorithms".
  • Ireland is working on a digital wallet to confirm the age and identity of social media users. Authorities have indicated that an Australia-style ban remains "an tools under consideration".
  • In The Spanish government, the leader has urged parliament to pass a law raising the minimum age for using social media to 16.
  • In The French government, the head of state has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has endorsed a comparable move, including an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
  • The administration in The Dutch government has advised parents to restrict their children from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has passed a symbolic statement calling for a ban for under-16s without parental consent is given. While it warns of the "compulsive" design of these services, the move does not create mandatory rules.

"A strong age limit is a useful foundation," commented one European lawmaker behind the initiative.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Stance

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has not ruled out a potential ban, stating that "no option is off the table" but maintaining any action must be "grounded in conclusive data".

Last year, support grew behind a proposal to introduce controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually modified. Instead, the administration vowed to investigate the matter.

Charities have expressed warnings. One foundation founded by the loved ones of a girl who was lost after viewing dangerous platform posts suggests that a strict age ban might not protect children and could result in a "cliff edge" of risk when young people become eligible.

"This ban is a reaction to the refusal of the tech sector to design products and services that are secure and age appropriate for children," commented a leading online safety campaigner.

The United States: A Fragmented Landscape

Stateside, legislation is mostly unfolding at the state level amid national gridlock.

  • Utah demands adult approval for under-18s to use social media and limits overnight use.
  • Florida has signed a measure banning those below 14 from accessing social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
  • The state of Virginia has enacted a regulation limiting minors to a single hour of social media time per day, with additional time needing a guardian's okay.
  • The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted measures mandating adult authorization for teenagers to create social media accounts.

Even with cross-party agreement and calls from various politicians to copy Australia's example, a US-wide ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

Global Outlook

Beyond these regions, further states are likewise exploring options.

  • Malaysia intends to restrict social media for under-16s effective next year.
  • Brazil has lifted the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

But, world organizations adopt a more measured position. Unicef has advised that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "might have unintended consequences". The organization notes that the internet can be a "lifeline" for isolated youth and that bans should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to prioritize child safeguards.

As this worldwide discussion unfolds, the policies of the Australian government and several other countries demonstrate that states around the world are less and less content to stand by for the industry to make changes on their own.

By

Kelly Wilson

Elena is a political journalist with over a decade of experience covering Westminster and European affairs, known for her incisive reporting.

Spin Talks

Type to search articles.